Quantitative reservoir evaluation and hydrocarbon volumetrics :an integrated petrophysical and 3-D static modeling approach in ‘Hamphidex’ field, Niger-Delta, Nigeria

Authors

  • Akindeji Opeyemi Fajana Department of Geophysics, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Nigeria
  • Adam Muhammed Olawale Department of Geophysics, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Nigeria
  • Hammed Ajibola Oyesomi Halliburton Energy Services Limited, Lagos, Nigeria

Keywords:

Lithology, Net-to-gross, Hydrocarbon saturation, Hydrocarbon reserves

Abstract

The viability and hydrocarbon volumetrics of the Hamphidex field reservoirs were evaluated using petrophysical analysis and three-dimensional (3D) static modeling of three key reservoir sands (X, Y, and Z). The petrophysical analysis involved detailed characterization of lithologies, net-to-gross ratios, porosity, hydrocarbon saturation, water saturation, and permeability. The volumetric attributes of the field were derived from the constructed 3D reservoir models. Two geostatistical methods—Sequential Gaussian Simulation (SGS) and Sequential Indicator Simulation (SIS)—were utilized for facies and property modeling, focusing on porosity and permeability. Comprehensive facies models and petrophysical property models were developed for each reservoir sand (X, Y, and Z), integrating 3D visualizations of facies distributions, porosity, permeability, water saturation, and fluid contact models. These models also included cross-sectional views, providing a detailed spatial representation of the reservoir's characteristics. Two main facies, sand and shale, were identified, with sand acting as the hydrocarbon reservoir. Well-log correlations in six wells (Hamdex-02, 06, 01, 05, 04 and 07) of the field show that sands X, Y, and Z have lateral continuity and their hydrocarbon potential varies between wells. Specifically, Sand ‘X’ contains hydrocarbons in Hamdex-05 and Hamdex-07, Sand ‘Y’ is hydrocarbon-rich in Hamdex-05, and Sand ‘Z’ shows hydrocarbon presence in Hamdex-06, Hamdex-05, and Hamdex-04. These hydrocarbons are confined within an anticlinal structural trap that closes on a fault. For Sand X, Y, and Z, porosity values range between 16 and 25%, permeability varies from 10 to 1600 mD, water saturation lies within 7 to 50%, and hydrocarbon saturation spans from 50 to 93%. The volumetric assessments from the build models showed that Sand X, Y and Z have Stock-Tank-Oil-Initially-In-Place (STOIIP) of 75.864, 8.566 and 80.177 Million Barrels (MMbbl) respectively. In addition to Sand Y STOIIP it also has Gas-Initially-In-Place (GIIP) of 14.870 Billion Standard Cubic Feet (Bscf). The analysis indicates that the field contains substantial hydrocarbon reserves, with the petrophysical properties confirming the reservoirs' high quality. These findings demonstrate that the field is economically viable and suitable for development, presenting a strong potential for successful exploitation.

Dimensions

[1] N. Babajide, P. Arimoro & Y. Kabir, “Tax regimes of oil producing giants: a comparative study of Iran, Nigeria and United States of America”, International journal of multidisciplinary research and development 2 (2015) 66. https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/2344799.

[2] I. A. Oyelowo, S. A. Ayanda & O. F. Alao, “Reservoir characterization and petrophysical evaluation of a hydrocarbon reservoir in Niger Delta Basin”, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology 9 (2019) 2303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-019-0651-1.

[3] A. O. Fajana, M. A. Ayuk & T. D. Omoyegun, “Comparison of modified Waxman-Smith algorithms and Archie models in prospectivity analysis of saturations in shaly-sand reservoirs: A case study of Pennay Field, Niger Delta”, Earth Science Informatics 14 (2021) 1647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00592-8.

[4] F. Theophilus, N. Okolie & C. Chukwuma, “Petrophysical and sedimentological analysis of oil reservoirs in the Niger Delta”, Petroleum Exploration Journal 38 (2021) 199.

[5] M. M. Senosy, M. Yousif & A. A. Salem, “Petrophysical and reservoir evaluation of the gas fields in the Nile Delta Basin, Egypt”, Journal of African Earth Sciences 169 (2020) 103893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2020.103893.

[6] A. O. Fajana, M. A. Ayuk & P. A. Enikanselu, “Integrated seismic interpretation and petrophysical analysis for hydrocarbon resource evaluation of Pennay-Field, Niger Delta”, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology 9 (2019) 123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-018-0579-4.

[7] A. O. Fajana, “Hydrocarbon reservoir characterization methodologies and uncertainties as a function of spatial location: a review from gigascale to nanoscale”, FUOYE Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences (FJPAS) 8 (2023) 82. https://fjpas.fuoye.edu.ng/index.php/fjpas/article/view/276.

[8] A. O. Fajana, “3-D static modeling of lateral heterogeneity using geostatistics and artificial neural networks in reservoir characterization of ‘P’ Field, Niger Delta”, NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics 9 (2023) 178. https://doi.org/10.1080/20909977.2020.1727674.

[9] G. Asquith & D. Krygowski, Basic well log analysis, Vol. 16, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, 2004, pp. 31-34. https://doi.org/10.1306/Mth16823.

[10] Google Earth, 2023, “Study area delineated using Google Earth imagery”, Nigeria. N4°37’40” and N4°37’40” to E6°48’20” and E 6°47’20”. [Online]. https://www.google.com/earth/.

[11] NIMET, 2024, Warri station annual average precipitation and rainy days, period 2022-2024. [Online]. https://nimet.gov.ng/datarequest.

[12] P. Stacher, “Present understanding of the Niger Delta hydrocarbon habitat”, in Geology of Deltas, M. N. Oti & G. Postma (Eds.), A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1995, pp. 257-267. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281508240_Present_understanding_of_the_Niger_Delta_hydrocarbon_habitat.

[13] W. L. M. Tuttle, R. R. Charpentier & M. E. Brownfield, “The Niger Delta petroleum system: Niger Delta province, Nigeria, Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea, Africa”, USGS. Denver Colorado. Open-file report 99-50-H, 1999. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr9950H.

[14] T. J. A. Reijers, S. W. Petters & C. S. Nwajide, “The Niger Delta Basin”, in African Basins--Sedimentary Basin of the World 3, R. C. Selley (Ed.), Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 1997, pp. 151-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-5997(97)80010-X.

[15] H. Doust & E. Omatsola, “Niger Delta”, in Divergent/passive margin basins, J. D. Edwards & P. A. Santogrossi (Eds.), AAPG Memoir 48: Tulsa, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1989, pp. 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1306/M48508C4.

[16] G. E. Archie, “The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics”, Petroleum Transactions of AIME 146 (1942) 54. https://doi.org/10.2118/942054-G.

Published

2025-01-13

How to Cite

Quantitative reservoir evaluation and hydrocarbon volumetrics :an integrated petrophysical and 3-D static modeling approach in ‘Hamphidex’ field, Niger-Delta, Nigeria. (2025). Journal of the Nigerian Society of Physical Sciences, 7(2), 2429. https://doi.org/10.46481/jnsps.2025.2429

Issue

Section

Earth Sciences

How to Cite

Quantitative reservoir evaluation and hydrocarbon volumetrics :an integrated petrophysical and 3-D static modeling approach in ‘Hamphidex’ field, Niger-Delta, Nigeria. (2025). Journal of the Nigerian Society of Physical Sciences, 7(2), 2429. https://doi.org/10.46481/jnsps.2025.2429