Numerical Simulation of Copper Indium Gallium Diselenide Solar Cells Using One Dimensional SCAPS Software

https://doi.org/10.46481/jnsps.2021.133

Authors

  • C. O. Lawani Department of Physics, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna, Nigeria
  • G. J. Ibeha Department of Physics, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna, Nigeria
  • Olumide Ige Department of Physics, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna, Nigeria
  • D. Eli Department of Physics, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna, Nigeria; Department of Physical Sciences, Greenfield University, Kasarami, Kaduna, Nigeria
  • J. O. Emmanuel Department of Physics, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna, Nigeria; Department of Basic Science and General Studies, Federal College of Forestry Mechanization, Kaduna, Nigeria
  • A. J. Ukwenya Department of Physics, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna, Nigeria
  • P. O. Oyedare Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Federal Polytechnic Ede, Osun State, Nigeria

Keywords:

SCAPs,, CIGS,, Multivalent defect,, buffer layer,, absorber,

Abstract

The effect of multivalent defect density, thickness of absorber and buffer layer thickness on the performance of CIGS solar cells were investigated systematically. The study was carried out using Solar Cells Capacitance Simulator (SCAPS) code, which is capable of solving the basic semiconductor equations. Employing numerical modelling, a solar cell with the structure Al|ZnO : Al|In2S3|CIGS|Pt was simulated and in it, a double acceptor defect (-2/-1/0) with a density of 1014 cm-3 was set in the absorber in the first instance. This initial device gave a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 25.85 %, short circuit current density (Jsc) of 37.9576 mAcm-2, Photovoltage (Voc) of 0.7992 V and fill factor (FF) of 85.22 %. When the density of multivalent defect (-2/-1/0) was varied between 1010 cm-3 and 1017 cm-3 the solar cells performance dropped from 26.81 % to 16.87 %. The champion device was with multivalent defect of 1010 cm-3 which shows an enhancement of 3.71 % from the pristine device. On varying the CIGS layer thickness from 0.4 um to 3.6 um, an increase in PCE was observed from 0.4 um to 1.2 um then the PCE began to decrease beyond a thickness of 1.2 um. The best PCE was recorded with thickness of 1.2 um which gave Jsc of 37.7506 mAcm-2, Voc of 0.8059 V, FF of 85.2655 %. On varying the In2S3 (buffer) layer thickness from 0.01 um to 0.08 um, we observed that there was no significant change in photovoltaic parameters of the solar cells as buffer layer thickness increased.

Dimensions

M. Hasan, M. Islam & A. Khan, Comprehensive analysis of CdS=In2S 3=ZnS buffer layers on performance of CIGS solar cell, Bachelor’s Degree project, Military institute of science and technology, Bangladesh, 2017.

P. Lynn, Electricity from sunlight: An introduction to photovoltaics, John Wiley and sons, 2010.

A. Hamanche, “Study of the type inversion of the semiconductor in irradiated solar cells”, Doctoral Dissertation, Mohamed Khider University, Democratic and popular republic of Algeria (2018).

K. Biswas, S. Lany & A. Zunger, “The consequences of multivalent elements in inorganic solar absorber: Multivalency of Sn in Cu2ZnSnS4”. Applied physics letters, 96 (2010) 201902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3427433.

S. Banerjee, Y. Ojha, K. Vikas & A. Kumar, “High efficient CIGS based thin-film solar cell performance optimization using PCID”, International research journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 3 (2016).

M. Mathew, “Engineering the properties of Indium Sulphide for thin-film solar cells by doping” (Doctoral dissertation). Cochin University of Science and Technology, India, (2009).

S. Ouedraogo, F. Zougmore, & J. Ndjaka, “Numerical analysis of Copper-Indium-Gallium-Diselenide based solar cells by SCAPS”.International Journal of Photoenergy, (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/421076.

A. Adekoya, A. Alabi, & A. Oni, “Performance of CIGS solar cell with changes in Absorber layer thickness and back contacts”, CARD international journal of science and advanced innovative research (IJSAIR), 2 (2017).

A. Niemegeers, S. Gillis & M. Burgleman, “A user program for realistic simulation of polycrystalline heterojunction solar cells; SCAPS-1D”, Proceedings of the 2nd world conference on photovoltaic energy conversion, Wein (1998).

N. Khoshsirat, & N. Yunus, “Copper- Indium- Gallium-Diselenide (CIGS) nanocrystalline bulk semiconductor as the absorber layer and its current technological trend and optimization”, (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/64166.

J. Keller, M. Knipper, J. Parisi, I. Riedel, T. Dalibor & A. Avellan, “Impact of thickness variation of the ZnO: Al window layer on optoelectronic properties of CIGSSe solar cells”. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc 1324 (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/opl.2011.1058.

A. Kotbi, B. Hartiti, A. Batan, S. Fadili, A. Ridah & P. Thevanin, “The effect of several parameters on the performance of CuInS2 – based solar cells using SCAPS-1D software”, Journal of fundamental and applied science, (2019), http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v11i2.11.

R. Scheer & H. Schock, “Chalcopyrite photovoltaics: physics, technologies and thin-film devices”. Wiley- VCH, (2011).

M. Ali, M. Hossain, M. Biswas, K. Alam & M. Khan, “Numerical simulation and observation the characteristics of CIGS thin-film solar cells using SCAPS-1D”. American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), 7 (2018), pp176-182.

M. Soce, M. Dieng, K. Ehemba, D. Diallo & I. Wade, “Influence of doping of the absorber and the charged defects on the electrical performance of CIGS solar cells”. International Journal of scientific and research publications, 5 (2015).

W. Haynes, “CRC handbook of chemistry and physics (97th ed)”. New York: CRC press, (2017).

S. Wei, S. Zhang & A. Zunger, “Effects of Ga addition to CuInSe2on its electronic, structural and defect properties”, Applied Physics letters, 72 (1998) 3199.

P. Jackson, R. Wuerz, D. Hariskos, E. Lotter, W. Witte & M. Powalla, “Effects of heavy alkali elements in Cu (In, Ga) Se2 solar cell with efficiencies up to 22.6 %”, Physica Status Solidi (RRL) (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pssr.201600199.

S. Dabbabi, T. Nasr & N. Kamoun-Turki, “Parameters optimization of CIGS solar cell using 2D physical modeling”. Results in physics, (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2017.06.057.

Y. Khattak, “Modelling of high-power conversion efficiency thin film solar cells” (Doctoral Dissertation), Universitat Politecaica de Valencia, (2019).

T. Duc, “Electronic properties of intrinsic defects and impurities in GaN”. Doctoral Dissertation, Linkoping University, Sweden, (2015).

S. Sienbentritt & U. Rau, “Wide gap chalcopyrites”, Springer – verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, (2006).

S. Zhang, S. Wei & A. Zunger, “Stabilization of energy compounds via ordered arrays of defect pairs”, Physical review letters 78 (1997).

M. Wanda, S. Ouedrago, F. Tchoo, F. Zougmore & J. Ndjaka, “Numerical investigation and analysis of Cu2ZnSnS4 based solar cells by SCAPS-1D”, International Journal of Photoenergy, (2019), https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2152018.

S. Oyedele, B. Soucase & B. Aka, “Numerical simulation and performance optimization of Cu (In, Ga) Se2 solar cells”, IOSR Journal of applied physics (JOSR-JAP), 18 (2016) 1.

J. Gray, “The physics of the solar cell”. In A. Luque & S. Hegedus (Eds), Handbook of photovoltaic science and engineering, John wiley and sons, (2003).

A. Chadel, B. Benyoucef, & M. Chadel, “A comparative study of CIGS solar cells based on Zn (O, S) bu er layers and CIGS solar cells based on CdS buffer layers”, Optoelectronics and advanced materials- rapid communications, 9 (2015) 653.

A. Benmir & M. Aida, “Analytical modelling and simulation of CIGS solar cells”, Energy procedia, 36 (2013) pp618-627, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.071.

M. Hossain, P. Chelvanathan, M. Zaman, M. Karim, M. Alghoul & N. Amin, “Prospects of Indium Sulphide as an Alternative to Cadmium Sulphide Buffer Layer in CIS Based Solar Cells From Numerical Analysis”, Chalcogenide Letters, 8 (2011).

P. Jackson, D. Hariskos, R. Wuerz, W. Wischmann & M. Powalla, “Compositional investigation of potassium doped Cu (In, Ga) Se2solar cells with efficiencies up to 20.8 %”, Physica Status Solidi (RRL), 8 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1002/pssr.201409040.

ZWS, “Thin film photovoltaics success story continues: ZWS sets European record of 22 percent for CIGS cells”, https ://www:zswbw:de/ f ileadmin/useru pload/PDFs/Pressemitteilungen/2016/pi07-2016-ZSW-CIGS 22Percent-en:pdf, (2016).

Lawani et al

Published

2021-05-29

How to Cite

C. O. Lawani, Ibeha, G. J. ., Ige, O., Danladi, E., Emmanuela, J. O. ., Ukwenya, A. J. ., & Oyedare, P. O. . (2021). Numerical Simulation of Copper Indium Gallium Diselenide Solar Cells Using One Dimensional SCAPS Software. Journal of the Nigerian Society of Physical Sciences, 3(2), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.46481/jnsps.2021.133

Issue

Section

Original Research